{"id":170818,"date":"2018-03-01T10:49:38","date_gmt":"2018-03-01T15:49:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/noaacoastsurvey.wordpress.com\/?p=170818"},"modified":"2026-04-24T17:15:57","modified_gmt":"2026-04-24T17:15:57","slug":"noaa-surveys-for-recreational-boat-traffic-safety-in-tampa-bay","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nauticalcharts.noaa.gov\/updates\/noaa-surveys-for-recreational-boat-traffic-safety-in-tampa-bay\/","title":{"rendered":"NOAA surveys for recreational boat traffic safety in Tampa Bay"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">NOAA\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/nauticalcharts.noaa.gov\/customer-service\/navigation-response.html\">navigation response team<\/a> 2 (NRT2), homeported in Fernandina Beach, Florida, conducted a survey around the Sunshine Skyway Bridge, which spans Tampa Bay. The U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) and additional members of the Tampa Bay Harbor Safety Committee requested the work and expressed interest in establishing alternate routes for recreational boating traffic. <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Alternative routes will alleviate increasing congestion where the main ship channel passes beneath the bridge. This area is naturally restrictive to navigation and, as a result, there have been multiple accidents<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> and near accidents here in the past.<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n<!--more-->\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image alignnone wp-image-170819 size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"748\" height=\"571\" src=\"https:\/\/noaacoastsurvey.files.wordpress.com\/2018\/03\/mbes_coverage.png\" alt=\"Multibeam echo sounder coverage. \" class=\"wp-image-170819\"\/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Multibeam echo sounder coverage. Credit: NOAA<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Lt. j.g.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Patrick Debroisse from NOAA Research Vessel <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Bay Hydro II<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">installed a topographic <a href=\"https:\/\/nauticalcharts.noaa.gov\/learn\/hydrographic-survey-equipment.html\">lidar system <\/a>on NRT2, which marked the first time a lidar system was employed from an NRT boat. The lidar system enabled 3D data to be collected for those portions of the bridge that are above water line. NRT2 collected lidar data for associated bridge protective structures and two fixed light range towers in addition to the bridge and bridge supports. \u00a0\u00a0<\/span><br><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The accurate positional and dimensional information gleaned from this data will be used to compliment extensive hydrographic sonar data collected beneath the surface. Together, the complete data set will enable full consideration of area features, both above and below the water line, in determining the placement of alternative routes.<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image alignnone size-full wp-image-170820\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1179\" height=\"261\" src=\"https:\/\/noaacoastsurvey.files.wordpress.com\/2018\/03\/tampabay_central-spans-in-hypack.png\" alt=\"The center spans of the Sunshine Skyway Bridge (left) were successfully captured from lidar data (right). Photo credits: NOAA\" class=\"wp-image-170820\"\/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">The center spans of the Sunshine Skyway Bridge (above) were successfully captured from lidar data (below). Credits: NOAA<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A USCG approval decision is anticipated in the spring. If approved, the chief of the cartographic team will work to have the alternate routes added to all affected NOAA charts.<\/span><br><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The NRT2 team consists of James Kirkpatrick (team lead), Lucas Blass, and Howie Meyers. NOAA\u2019s NRTs operate trailer-able survey launches to provide time-sensitive information during emergency response and maritime incidents such as vessel groundings, sinkings, or cargo loss. The launches are equipped with multibeam and side scan sonar, which can help identify navigation hazards and mitigate risk to life and property.<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The largest scale <a href=\"https:\/\/nauticalcharts.noaa.gov\/charts\/noaa-raster-charts.html\">raster navigational charts\u00a0<\/a>of this area, charts\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.charts.noaa.gov\/OnLineViewer\/11415.shtml\">11415<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.charts.noaa.gov\/OnLineViewer\/11416.shtml\">11416<\/a>, are available online.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>NOAA\u2019s navigation response team 2 (NRT2), homeported in Fernandina Beach, Florida, conducted a survey around the Sunshine Skyway Bridge, which spans Tampa Bay. The U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) and additional members of the Tampa Bay Harbor Safety Committee requested the work and expressed interest in establishing alternate routes for recreational boating traffic. Alternative routes will &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/nauticalcharts.noaa.gov\/updates\/noaa-surveys-for-recreational-boat-traffic-safety-in-tampa-bay\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;NOAA surveys for recreational boat traffic safety in Tampa Bay&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":170819,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,25,10,11,49,35,24],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-170818","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-bathymetry","category-cartography","category-nautical-charts","category-navigation-response-teams","category-recreational-boating","category-remote-sensing-surveys","category-technology"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nauticalcharts.noaa.gov\/updates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/170818","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nauticalcharts.noaa.gov\/updates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nauticalcharts.noaa.gov\/updates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nauticalcharts.noaa.gov\/updates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nauticalcharts.noaa.gov\/updates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=170818"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/nauticalcharts.noaa.gov\/updates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/170818\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":185585,"href":"https:\/\/nauticalcharts.noaa.gov\/updates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/170818\/revisions\/185585"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nauticalcharts.noaa.gov\/updates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/170819"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nauticalcharts.noaa.gov\/updates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=170818"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nauticalcharts.noaa.gov\/updates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=170818"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nauticalcharts.noaa.gov\/updates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=170818"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}