{"id":36551,"date":"2014-11-12T10:39:17","date_gmt":"2014-11-12T15:39:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/noaacoastsurvey.wordpress.com\/?p=36551"},"modified":"2014-11-12T10:39:17","modified_gmt":"2014-11-12T15:39:17","slug":"coast-survey-amistad","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nauticalcharts.noaa.gov\/updates\/coast-survey-amistad\/","title":{"rendered":"Coast Survey\u2019s little known role in the case of the Amistad"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><figure id=\"attachment_36598\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-36598\" style=\"width: 300px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"https:\/\/noaacoastsurvey.files.wordpress.com\/2014\/11\/washington.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-36598 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/noaacoastsurvey.files.wordpress.com\/2014\/11\/washington.jpg?w=300\" alt=\"Coast Survey Brig Washington\" width=\"300\" height=\"232\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-36598\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Coast Survey Brig <em>Washington<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure><br \/>\nLt. Thomas R. Gedney, a U.S. Navy officer commanding the <a href=\"http:\/\/oceanexplorer.noaa.gov\/history\/early\/media\/4_washington.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">U.S. Coast Survey Brig <em>Washington<\/em><\/a> on August 20, 1839, was surveying the area between New York&#8217;s Montauk Point and Gardiner&#8217;s Island. He &#8220;discovered a strange and suspicious looking vessel off Culloden Point, near said Montauk Point,&#8221; according to his <a href=\"http:\/\/www.archives.gov\/education\/lessons\/amistad\/gedney-statement.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">statement to Connecticut District Court<\/a> Judge Andrew T. Judson. Gedney and his officers took possession of the vessel. The ship captured by the <em>Washington<\/em> proved to be the Spanish schooner called <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.npg.si.edu\/col\/amistad\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">L\u2019Amistad<\/a>\u00a0\u2013 <\/em>the ship carrying Africans who revolted against their captors and tried to sail back to Africa&#8230; Thus began a little known piece of U.S. Coast Survey history. (It is so little known, in fact, that the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.imdb.com\/title\/tt0118607\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">1997 movie Amistad<\/a> did not mention Coast Survey.)<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nThe <a href=\"http:\/\/nmaahc.si.edu\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">National Museum of African American History and Culture<\/a> is presenting a new exhibit of six murals at the Smithsonian&#8217;s National Museum of American History. <a href=\"http:\/\/nmaahc.si.edu\/Exhibitions\/Rising\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Rising Up: Hale Woodruff\u2019s Murals at Talladega College<\/a>, portrays the heroic resistance to slavery. Three of the six historic murals on exhibition refer to the slave ship <em>Amistad.<\/em><br \/>\nGedney\u2019s capture of the <em>Amistad<\/em> was very early in Coast Survey\u2019s history, when naval officers were assigned to command Coast Survey vessels. Gedney was one of the two first senior naval officers attached to the Coast Survey. (The other was George S. Blake.) In 1834, Gedney commanded the Coast Survey\u2019s first hydrographic vessel, the <em>Jersey<\/em>, and in 1835 <a title=\"Gedney survey 1835\" href=\"http:\/\/historicalcharts.noaa.gov\/historicals\/preview\/image\/H00053-00-1838\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">discovered the Gedney Channel<\/a> into New York Harbor. Gedney is also known for tackling the would-be assassin of President Andrew Jackson on January 31, 1835, after the gunman\u2019s pistol(s) had misfired \u2012 twice. He reportedly protected the gunman, Richard Lawrence, from the wrath of the crowd so Lawrence could be brought to justice. Gedney joined the Navy in 1815, and died in 1857.<br \/>\nThere were two trials on the <em>Amistad<\/em>: one criminal, for the mutiny; the other was a civil trial, where Gedney et.al. libeled (claimed) as \u201csalvage\u201d the cargo, provisions, cash, and \u201cfifty-four slaves, to wit, fifty-one male slaves, and three young female slaves, who were worth twenty-five thousand dollars.\u201d (See the copies of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.archives.gov\/education\/lessons\/amistad\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">original documents at the National Archives<\/a>.)<br \/>\nThere were several competing claims for the Africans, involving Queen Isabella of Spain and the two men who said they owned the slaves. If you\u2019ve seen the movie, you know that the case pivoted on the status of the men and women captured on the <em>Amistad<\/em>. The District Court ruled that the Africans were free individuals; kidnapped and transported illegally, they had never been slaves. Therefore, the court allowed salvage to Lieutenant Gedney and others, on the vessel and cargo, of one-third of the value thereof, \u201cbut not on the negroes\u2026\u201d<br \/>\n<figure id=\"attachment_36596\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-36596\" style=\"width: 1000px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/noaacoastsurvey.files.wordpress.com\/2014\/11\/trial-009_hw_dig.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-large wp-image-36596\" src=\"https:\/\/noaacoastsurvey.files.wordpress.com\/2014\/11\/trial-009_hw_dig.jpg?w=1000\" alt=\"Amistad mural: the Court Scene\" width=\"1000\" height=\"285\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-36596\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">The Amistad Murals consists of three panels: The Revolt, The Court Scene (pictured here), and Back to Africa. They are normally housed in <a title=\"Talladega College\" href=\"http:\/\/www.talladega.edu\/about.asp\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Talladega College\u2019s<\/a> Savery Library and are some of artist Hale Aspacio Woodruff\u2019s best known works.<\/figcaption><\/figure><br \/>\nThe court ordered President Martin Van Buren to have them transported back to Africa. After going through the appeal process, President Van Buren ordered government lawyers to appeal the case to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court heard the case, with former president John Quincy Adams arguing against the government and on behalf of the Africans. On March 9, 1841, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Africans. They also provided a note on Gedney:<br \/>\n\u201cAs to the claim of Lieutenant Gedney for the salvage service, it is understood that the United States do not now desire to interpose any obstacle to the allowance of it, if it is deemed reasonable by the Court. It was a highly meritorious and useful service to the proprietors of the ship and cargo; and such as, by the general principles of maritime law, is always deemed a just foundation for salvage. The rate allowed by the Court, does not seem to us to have been beyond the exercise of a sound discretion, under the very peculiar and embarrassing circumstances of the case.\u201d<br \/>\nIn other words, Gedney got his share of the cargo, but not the \u201cslaves\u201d he had also claimed as prizes.<br \/>\n(Read the <a href=\"http:\/\/law2.umkc.edu\/faculty\/projects\/ftrials\/amistad\/AMI_SCT2.HTM\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">full Supreme Court decision<\/a>, written by Justice Joseph Story.)<br \/>\nThe Amistad murals will be on view at the <a href=\"http:\/\/americanhistory.si.edu\/exhibitions\/rising-up\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">National Museum of Natural History<\/a> until March 2015.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Lt. Thomas R. Gedney, a U.S. Navy officer commanding the U.S. Coast Survey Brig Washington on August 20, 1839, was surveying the area between New York&#8217;s Montauk Point and Gardiner&#8217;s Island. He &#8220;discovered a strange and suspicious looking vessel off Culloden Point, near said Montauk Point,&#8221; according to his statement to Connecticut District Court Judge &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/nauticalcharts.noaa.gov\/updates\/coast-survey-amistad\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Coast Survey\u2019s little known role in the case of the Amistad&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[50],"tags":[117,263],"class_list":["post-36551","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-history","tag-amistad","tag-gedney"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nauticalcharts.noaa.gov\/updates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36551","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nauticalcharts.noaa.gov\/updates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nauticalcharts.noaa.gov\/updates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nauticalcharts.noaa.gov\/updates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nauticalcharts.noaa.gov\/updates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=36551"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/nauticalcharts.noaa.gov\/updates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36551\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nauticalcharts.noaa.gov\/updates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=36551"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nauticalcharts.noaa.gov\/updates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=36551"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nauticalcharts.noaa.gov\/updates\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=36551"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}